##BEST## Download Article Scientifique Original Pdf
We recommend that a preprint is posted on only one server. bioRxiv provides metrics for article views, PDF downloads, and attention scores. Authors will find these metrics are underestimated in article-to-article comparisons if a manuscript appears on more than one server. In addition, readers may be frustrated by encountering the same preprint in more than one location. bioRxiv and medRxiv decline manuscripts that have already been posted on an established preprint server. Posting to both bioRxiv and medRxiv is not permitted and will result in article withdrawal.
Download article scientifique original pdf
At the time the website was hosted in St. Petersburg, Russia, where judgments made by American courts were not enforceable,[47] and Sci-Hub did not defend the lawsuit.[45] In June 2017, the court awarded Elsevier US$15 million in damages for copyright infringement by Sci-Hub and others in a default judgment.[45] The judgment found that Sci-Hub used accounts of students and academic institutions to access articles through Elsevier's platform ScienceDirect.[47] The judgment also granted the injunction, which led to the loss of the original sci-hub.org domain.[4][14][52]
In December 2020, Elsevier, Wiley and the American Chemical Society filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Sci-Hub and Library Genesis in the Delhi High Court. The plaintiffs seek a dynamic injunction which means that any future domain, IP, or name-change by the respondents will not require the plaintiffs to return to court for an additional injunction.[67][68] The court restricted the sites from uploading, publishing, or making any article available until 6 January 2021.[20] In response to the lawsuit, as well as to Elbakyan's claim that the FBI had requested data from her Apple account, Reddit users on the subreddit r/DataHoarder organized to download and seed backups of the articles on Sci-Hub, with the intention of creating a decentralized and uncensorable version of the site.[29][69]
A 2020 a study by researchers from 4 countries on 3 continents found that articles downloaded from Sci-Hub were cited 1.72 times more than papers not downloaded from Sci-Hub;[100] the study's methods and conclusions were disputed by Phil Davis in a Scholarly Kitchen article.[101]
An analysis of locational data from January 2022 indicated that researchers worldwide are accessing papers using Sci-Hub. China, which topped the chart, had more than 25 million downloads in a month. The U.S. was the second largest (ca. 38% of PRC downloads), and France the third largest (24% of the U.S.). India had the second-highest number of individual users but only ranked fifth in downloads. This study only assessed downloads from the original Sci-Hub websites and excluded replica or "mirror" sites. It therefore did not count downloads from places where the original domain is banned (e.g. the UK). Furthermore. the use of VPN can skew some results (e.g. possibly India).[105]
Publishers have been critical of Sci-Hub, some claiming that it is undermining more widely accepted open-access initiatives[89] and that it ignores how publishers "work hard" to make access for third-world nations easier.[89] It has also been criticized by librarians for compromising universities' network security and jeopardizing legitimate access to papers by university staff.[79][89][16][80] The cybersecurity threat posed by Sci-Hub has been questioned and the suggestion made that the threat has been exaggerated by large publishers keen to protect their business model by discrediting Sci-Hub or pushing universities to block students access to Sci-Hub.[15][118] Moreover, even prominent Western institutions such as Harvard and Cornell have had to cut down their access to publications due to ever-increasing subscription costs,[119] potentially causing some of the highest use of Sci-Hub to be in American cities with well-known universities (this may, however, be due to the convenience of the site rather than a lack of access).[5] Sci-Hub can be seen as one venue in a general trend in which research is becoming more accessible.[120] Many academics, university librarians, and longtime advocates for open scholarly research believe Elbakyan is "giving academic publishers their Napster moment," referring to the illegal music-sharing service that "disrupted and permanently altered the industry."[10]For her actions in creating Sci-Hub, Elbakyan has been called a hero and "spiritual successor to Aaron Swartz," who in 2010 downloaded millions of academic articles from JSTOR.[13][121] She has also been compared to Edward Snowden.[121] She has also been called a "Robin Hood of science."[122]
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews. In order to encourage its wide dissemination this article is freely accessible on BMJ, PLOS Medicine, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and International Journal of Surgery journal websites.
The Elsevier article class helps you to format the frontmatter of your manuscript properly. It is part of the elsarticle package. This package is contained in most TeX distributions and is available on CTAN. The elsarticle documentation and some common templates and bibliographic styles are part of this package as well. You can download a set of files containing a template LaTeX manuscript, using the elsarticle class, plus associated BibTeX style files here. Although elsarticle.cls supports most journal styles, it is not possible to match the journal's layout exactly.
For more complex articles two additional class files and templates are available, single-column (cas-sc.cls) and double-column (cas-dc.cls). These can be downloaded from CTAN (els-cas-template.zip). These class files are documented here.
Do not worry, selecting this option this will not immediately send the project files to arXiv; instead, it displays another window which lets you download your article, complete with .bbl file, for onward submission to arXiv:
Sci-Hub is a website link with over 64.5 million academic papers and articles available for direct download. It bypasses publisher paywalls by allowing access through educational institution proxies. To download papers Sci-Hub stores papers in its repository, this storage is called Library Genesis (LibGen) or library genesis proxy 2023.
As noted above, when possible, we recommend saving items using the Save to Zotero button in your browser from the primary webpage (e.g, a journal article's abstract page) rather than adding PDFs directly. The Save to Zotero button will usually save high-quality metadata and also automatically download the relevant PDF if you have access to it.
Copyright: 2005 John P. A. Ioannidis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 041b061a72